I am beginning to see myself not as a person who will be proven right many years down the road, I'd rather see myself as someone who is correct NOW and only the people who can accurately judge the information they are told in school will be privy to the ideas presented. On that note, they can accept or reject as they please, but the option is now available. I've learned that it is not a question of who's right or wrong, it was never about that, it has always been about allowing people to evolve on their own terms. Some people can handle this idea, some cannot. Whether it is right or wrong was never the main issue, because to fully grasp it your worldview changes permanently. When it comes to emotional and moral changes the issue is much more complex than a True/False test.
Most academics are not at the top of human understanding, as we have found out. Most academics will never even see this theory. On the other side of the spectrum some people who have never step foot in a university setting will instantaneously understand this theory, that planets evolve (from their hotter star-like state), to take on the very structure we are standing on. I'm here for those people, those people who's intuition is guiding them like my own, to question the people preaching "facts". Its the same shit priests did to the peasants... you are not educated enough to interpret the will of God. These days the academics use math to throw people under the bus. Just like scripture, math makes reality vague and subtracts meaning, and can be interpreted by crazy people.
Sunday, January 8, 2017
Saturday, January 7, 2017
Sunday, December 25, 2016
Left side = magma oceans from orbiting a star too closely in the past
Right side = the cooler side without magma oceans
It was a lava planet at one point, it did not form as a piece of the Earth, it came from somewhere else in the galaxy and is probably vastly older than the Earth.
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
I think earthquakes are caused by the ground contracting as the Earth cools. Civil engineers know about this when they design concrete and steel bridges. They have to make gaps in the bridge to allow for the structure to expand/contract during the seasons and day/night cycle. If no gaps are made then cracking can occur in random places jeopardizing the structural integrity of the bridge. The Earth has cracks for exactly this reason, the structural integrity of the crust is not uniform, and it has no place specifically that can allow for the entire crust to contract on itself as the Earth cools (the mantle solidifying). Earthquakes are the surface effects that are a direct result of the Earth contracting near the cracks where the structural integrity of the crust is weakest.
None of this is mentioned in Ben's videos. All the focus it seems is on disaster, catastrophe and the Sun.
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
They will be in a long term state of shock and confusion because of them finding exo-worlds in all size ranges. Why such a massive range of diversity? Well, stellar evolution continues all the way to when the star completely solidifies into a Mercury/Earth sized object.
Check out the graph. It should be quite obvious by now! Or not!? Maybe?!
Who knows what's twirling around in these people's brains. Sure, they can write stuff in a document/magazine/book... but what are they REALLY THINKING?!
Your guess is probably as good as mine.